Ranked
The best AI companion apps, ranked by what we could actually verify
Three of our top four pay us nothing. That is not a boast — it is the only way to read a ranking like this. Every other list you find was ordered by commission rate, and the app paying $44 a sale is at number one on all of them.
The ranking
| # | App | Best for | Price | Pays us |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Character.AI | Most people, free | Free · $9.99/mo | Nothing |
| 2 | Janitor AI | Free and unfiltered | Free | Nothing |
| 3 | Candy.ai | Value, if you'll pay | $47.88/yr | Up to $44 |
| 4 | Nomi.ai | Long conversations | $99.99/yr | Nothing |
| 5 | PolyBuzz | Trying it cheaply | $4.99/week | Unknown |
| 6 | Replika | Nobody, currently | $7.99–14.99/mo | Nothing |
| 7 | DreamGF | Nobody | Renews $311.88/yr | Nothing |
1. Character.AI — the one most people should start with
165.9 million monthly visits, global rank #191, and 4.3 out of 5 from roughly 555,000 App Store ratings. That is the largest sample of user opinion in this entire category and it is not a rating a bad product sustains.
Run by Character Technologies, Inc. of Menlo Park, California — a named US corporation you could actually take to court. In August 2024 Google struck a licensing-and-hiring deal reportedly worth around $2.7 billion. Worth being precise, since most write-ups aren't: Google did not acquire the company. It licensed the technology and hired the founders.
The free tier is the whole product, gated by queues and ads rather than a message cap. $9.99/month or $94.99/year removes the queue.
The filter blocks far more than adult content. Reviewers report innocuous interactions refused — one specifically cites hugging. This is the single most common complaint by a wide margin, and the $9.99 tier does not fix it. It buys the queue away, not the filter.
Queue waits at peak are genuinely bad. One reviewer documented them climbing from three minutes to twelve, then to roughly fifty-three, then past two hours.
It is also the only app here with a near-even audience — 51% male, 49% female — which tells you it is used for storytelling and company rather than as a romance product. Full comparison against Janitor AI here.
2. Janitor AI — free, unfiltered, and nobody knows who runs it
143.1 million monthly visits, growing 12.86% month over month — the fastest growth in the category. An 18 minute 10 second average visit, which is extraordinary for any website and tells you people who get in do not leave.
Genuinely free. The platform ships its own model, JanitorLLM, and charges no subscription. Better output usually means connecting an external model through a proxy — typically OpenRouter, whose free tier allows 50 requests a day, rising permanently to 1,000 once you have bought $10 in credits at any point.
NO ENTITY DISCLOSED Janitor AI publishes no company name, no registration number, no jurisdiction — a platform claiming 15 million users with no identifiable legal person behind it. There is nobody to complain to. Not a company that might ignore you; no addressee at all.
It ranks second because free and unfiltered is a real proposition and it cannot overcharge you, trap you in a renewal, or refuse a refund — it never takes your card. Full safety assessment here.
3. Candy.ai — the best value if you are going to pay
$47.88 for twelve months is the cheapest serious paid option in this category. For scale: Nomi charges $99.99 and DreamGF's annual plan renews at $311.88.
Operated by EverAI Limited, Malta, registration C107181 — a named, registered EU company. It accepts Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDC and Litecoin, and uses discreet statement descriptors. Those are substantive privacy features, not marketing.
The free tier is five messages per month. Not per day. That is a demo, not a trial — you cannot evaluate anything with it. The $5.60 weekly plan is the real way in.
The refund window is 24 hours, and closes once you have spent 20 tokens. Image generation spends tokens. It is possible to disqualify yourself from a refund in your first hour while testing the exact feature you paid for. EU and UK buyers get a statutory 14-day right of withdrawal regardless.
One number to carry: 52.71% of Candy.ai's desktop traffic comes from affiliate marketing — the highest in the category. That is why every review you find is glowing, and it is why we put two free apps above it. Full review here.
4. Nomi.ai — for people who want the conversation to remember
4.6 out of 5 on the App Store, the highest rating here, though from a much smaller sample (2,700 ratings) than Character.AI's 555,000. Run by AI Glimpse Inc. Up to ten companions per account, group chats, voice with emotional tone variation, in-context selfies, and proactive messaging.
$15.99/month, $39.99/quarter, or $99.99/year — the most expensive serious option here.
VENDOR CLAIM Nomi markets itself as "the only AI with human-level long term memory." That is the company's own wording. We found no independent benchmark substantiating it. The reputation is real in enthusiast communities; the measurement does not exist. Treat it as a strong community consensus, not a tested fact.
Full review, including the price rise its own App Store listing reveals.
5. PolyBuzz — cheap to start, and that is the problem
Run by Cloud Whale Interactive Technology LLC (formerly branded Poly.AI). 4.4 out of 5 from 466,000 ratings — a large, credible sample.
$4.99 per week annualises to roughly $259 a year — more than five times Candy.ai's $47.88, for something priced to feel like pocket change. Monthly tiers run $9.90, $19.90 and $29.90.
Reviewers also report aggressive ad spam every 10 to 50 messages on the free tier, and long-term users saying the developers "make it worse and worse."
6. Replika — historically important, currently hard to recommend
Leaving Replika? Where to go instead.
The app that created this category, run by Luka, Inc. 4.4 out of 5 from 228,000 ratings. $7.99–$14.99/month.
It carries more regulatory baggage than anything else here. Italy's data protection regulator fined Luka €5,000,000 on 10 April 2025 — no lawful basis for processing, inadequate disclosures, no data protection by design, and no age verification. Separately, three organisations filed an FTC complaint in January 2025 alleging deceptive marketing and testimonials from users who do not exist. We found no evidence the FTC has acted; a complaint is an allegation, not a finding.
Its own App Store reviews are dominated by one theme: memory loss. "Every time you talk to your Replika it's like the first time all over again."
UNVERIFIED Replika removed erotic roleplay in February 2023, then partially restored it for some users. We could not establish the current policy from any reliable source, and we are not going to guess. If this matters to you, test an account before paying.
7. DreamGF — disqualified on pricing
Operated by DreamAI SRL, Bucharest. The product may be perfectly good; we have not assessed the chat or image quality. It ranks last on one fact alone.
The annual plan advertises $69.99 and renews at $311.88 — 4.5 times the entry price. Then do the division: $311.88 ÷ 12 = $25.99. $77.97 ÷ 3 = $25.99. The monthly plan renews at $25.99.
Every DreamGF plan renews at exactly $25.99 a month. The multi-month "discounts" are discounts on the first term only. A longer commitment does not buy a better rate — it buys a bigger gap between what you were shown and what you pay.
All of it is disclosed on their own pricing page. That makes it aggressive rather than deceptive — but the annual plan at $311.88 is the most expensive option in this category, and it looks like the cheapest. Full breakdown.
Not ranked, and why
- CrushOn.AI (TECHIEPIE LTD, Cyprus) and SpicyChat — both have real scale, but their pricing pages render entirely in JavaScript and returned nothing to every method we tried. We could not verify a single price. Any site publishing exact tiers for these two is copying another affiliate, not the source.
- Kupid AI (SNB Technologies LTD, Cyprus) — advertises "unlimited chat for free" on its landing page with no published limits and no reachable pricing. Treat that as a claim, not a specification.
- Muah.AI — excluded deliberately. It was breached in September 2024, exposing 1.9 million accounts including users' prompts and stated sexual fetishes, and people were being extorted with that data within three days. Nearly two years on, its site still carries no breach notice. The full record is here.
How we ranked these
Four criteria, in this order. None of them is commission rate.
- Can you find out who runs it? A named, registered company means somebody to complain to, a regulator with jurisdiction, and a court that would hear it. Character.AI, Candy.ai, Nomi, Replika, PolyBuzz and DreamGF all name an entity. Janitor AI and Muah.AI do not.
- Is the pricing what it appears to be? We compared advertised rates against what is actually charged and what happens at renewal. This is where DreamGF and PolyBuzz lost most of their position.
- Can you evaluate it before paying? A five-message monthly demo is not a trial. Genuinely free products earned a real advantage here.
- What is the security and regulatory record? Confirmed breaches, regulatory fines, and published audits — from primary sources like Have I Been Pwned and the regulators themselves, never from other review sites.
What we did not rank on: conversation quality. We have not run controlled tests across these apps, and neither has anyone else publishing a list like this. Everyone claiming to have "tested" fifteen AI companions and rated their emotional depth is describing a vibe. We would rather tell you the refund terms are 24 hours and 20 tokens, because that is checkable and it will actually affect you.
Find the app that pays the highest commission — in this category that is Candy.ai at up to $44 a sale — and see where it ranks. If it is number one on a list where free, zero-commission apps exist and perform well, you are reading an advertisement.
Ours has it at number three, below two apps that pay us nothing.
Sources
- Pricing, corporate registration, free-tier limits and refund terms — each company's own site and terms of service, checked 25 August 2026: candy.ai, dreamgf.ai, janitorai.com, nomi.ai
- App Store ratings and in-app purchase pricing for Character.AI, Nomi, PolyBuzz and Replika — Apple App Store listings, checked 25 August 2026.
- Traffic, rank, growth and audience data — Similarweb, July 2026: character.ai, janitorai.com, candy.ai
- OpenRouter API rate limits: openrouter.ai/docs/api-reference/limits
- Muah.AI breach record, 1.9 million accounts: haveibeenpwned.com/Breach/Muah
- Garante fine of Luka, Inc., 10 April 2025: edpb.europa.eu; FTC complaint reporting: TIME
- Google–Character.AI licensing deal and subsequent litigation: Fortune
- Affiliate payout terms: CrakRevenue